Postavke privatnosti

Accusations against Donald Trump of sexual harassment in 1993 are back in the spotlight ahead of the 2024 presidential election

Donald Trump faces serious allegations of sexual assault in 1993 from former model Stacey Williams. In the midst of the presidential campaign, this accusation could affect the outcome of the election as the Trump campaign denies all accusations, calling them politically motivated attacks.

Accusations against Donald Trump of sexual harassment in 1993 are back in the spotlight ahead of the 2024 presidential election
Photo by: Domagoj Skledar/ arhiva (vlastita)

Allegations against Donald Trump from 1993 back in the spotlight


As the upcoming presidential elections in the United States approach, Donald Trump, the Republican party candidate and former president, faces a new wave of allegations of sexual assault dating back to 1993. The allegations were brought forth by Stacey Williams, a former model who claimed that Trump inappropriately touched her in Trump Tower in New York after she was introduced to him by Jeffrey Epstein. Williams made her claims during a call organized by the group 'Survivors for Kamala', which supports the campaign of Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for the 2024 presidential elections.


History of events


According to Stacey Williams' statements, the incident occurred after Epstein, with whom she was in an on-and-off relationship at the time, suggested they visit Trump in his office. Williams described how Trump greeted her, but she soon began to feel uncomfortable when Trump started to inappropriately touch her breasts, waist, and buttocks. According to her words, in that moment she 'froze' and didn't know how to react. Later, as they were leaving Trump Tower, Epstein allegedly criticized her for 'allowing' Trump to touch her in that way.


Williams further described how she subsequently experienced feelings of shame and confusion, and shortly after the incident, she cut off contact with Epstein. She claimed that at the time she was not aware of the patterns of abuse that Epstein was involved in, which were later revealed by numerous reports and testimonies.


Reaction from Trump's campaign


Trump's campaign has strongly denied the allegations, calling them 'unequivocally false' and politically motivated. His representatives claimed that the allegations were orchestrated by Kamala Harris' opposing campaign team, just a few weeks before the election, to damage Trump's candidacy. This is not the first time Trump has faced allegations of sexual assault, as over twenty women have previously made similar claims, including allegations of inappropriate kissing, unwanted touching, and intrusions into beauty contestants' dressing rooms while they were changing.


Background and previous allegations


Allegations against Donald Trump have frequently surfaced during his presidential campaigns. In 2016, several women publicly made similar claims, which Trump denied at the time. The E. Jean Carroll case, which resulted in a lawsuit, is one of the most notable, involving alleged sexual assault in the Bergdorf Goodman department store in the 1990s. Trump also denied this case, but the media attention did not wane, nor did the public pressure. Allegations like these always generate a strong media response, especially ahead of elections, and serve as a political weapon in the fight for votes.


Political consequences


This latest allegation comes at a crucial moment in the campaign and is being used as a tool to discredit Trump among voters who may decide the election. Stacey Williams, who is now coming forward as a survivor of abuse, becomes a symbol of the fight against the alleged abusive behavior of powerful men. The group 'Survivors for Kamala' is also using this opportunity to mobilize support for Harris, urging voters to stand with women fighting against injustice.


The question of credibility and legal epilogue


Trump's campaign disputes the credibility of the allegations, stating that they have been manipulatively timed to create a negative perception of him among voters. Although similar allegations have previously led to legal actions, it remains unclear whether this allegation will end up in court. Previous allegations made against Trump included cases where he, according to the claims of the accusers, was present in the company of Epstein, which further complicates Trump's defense as Epstein's connections to a network of sexual abuse are well documented.


In addition to her testimony, Williams showed a postcard that she allegedly received from Trump after the incident, which read: "Stacey – Your home away from home. With love, Donald." This evidence lends additional weight to her claims, but Trump's campaign continues to dismiss the allegations as fabricated and politically motivated.


In the coming weeks, depending on further developments, these allegations could have far-reaching consequences on the election outcome, especially if there are additional testimonies or evidence that would support Stacey Williams' claims. Currently, public opinion remains divided as the media continues to follow the situation.

Find accommodation nearby

Creation time: 28 October, 2024

Political desk

The political desk shapes its content with the belief that responsible writing and a solid understanding of social processes hold essential value in the public sphere. For years, we have been analyzing political events, monitoring changes that affect citizens, and reflecting on the relationships between institutions, individuals, and the international community. Our approach is based on experience gained through long-term work in journalism and direct observation of political scenes in different countries and systems.

In our editorial work, we emphasize context, because we know that politics is never just the news of the day. Behind every move, statement, or decision are circumstances that define its true significance, and our task is to bring readers closer to the background and intentions that are not visible at first glance. In our articles, we strive to build a vivid picture of society – its tensions, ambitions, problems, and those moments when opportunities for change arise.

Over the years, we have learned that political reporting is not reduced to retelling conferences and press releases. It requires patience, observation, and a willingness to compare various sources, assess credibility, recognize patterns of behavior, and find meaning in actions that sometimes seem contradictory. To achieve this, we rely on experience gained through long-term work with public institutions, civil society organizations, analysts, and individuals who shape political reality through their activities.

Our writing stems from personal fieldwork: from conventions, protests, parliamentary sessions, international forums, and conversations with people who experience politics from within. These encounters shape texts in which we strive to be clear, precise, and fair, without dramatizing and without deviating from facts. We want the reader to feel informed, not overwhelmed, and to receive a picture that enables them to independently assess what a given decision means for their everyday life.

The political desk believes in the importance of open and responsible journalism. In a world full of quick reactions and sensationalism, we choose diligent, long-term work on texts that offer a broader perspective. It is a slower path, but the only one that ensures content that is thorough, credible, and in the service of the reader. Our approach has grown from decades of experience and the conviction that an informed citizen is the strongest guardian of democratic processes.

That is why our publications do not merely follow the daily news cycle. They seek to understand what political events truly mean, where they lead, and how they fit into the broader picture of international relations. We write with respect for the reader and with the awareness that politics is not an isolated field, but a space where economy, culture, identity, security, and the individual life of each person intersect.

NOTE FOR OUR READERS
Karlobag.eu provides news, analyses and information on global events and topics of interest to readers worldwide. All published information is for informational purposes only.
We emphasize that we are not experts in scientific, medical, financial or legal fields. Therefore, before making any decisions based on the information from our portal, we recommend that you consult with qualified experts.
Karlobag.eu may contain links to external third-party sites, including affiliate links and sponsored content. If you purchase a product or service through these links, we may earn a commission. We have no control over the content or policies of these sites and assume no responsibility for their accuracy, availability or any transactions conducted through them.
If we publish information about events or ticket sales, please note that we do not sell tickets either directly or via intermediaries. Our portal solely informs readers about events and purchasing opportunities through external sales platforms. We connect readers with partners offering ticket sales services, but do not guarantee their availability, prices or purchase conditions. All ticket information is obtained from third parties and may be subject to change without prior notice. We recommend that you thoroughly check the sales conditions with the selected partner before any purchase, as the Karlobag.eu portal does not assume responsibility for transactions or ticket sale conditions.
All information on our portal is subject to change without prior notice. By using this portal, you agree to read the content at your own risk.