Sports

Babić’s remarks after Goat League attack, Martinjak’s apology and legal fallout in Tomislav Mrkonjić case

The Goat League final incident, in which Marko Martinjak seriously injured Tomislav Mrkonjić with a headbutt, moved far beyond the futsal court. After a police complaint, investigative detention and a public apology, Babić’s defence of the fighter sparked further debate over fair play, responsibility and violence in sport

· 12 min read
Babić’s remarks after Goat League attack, Martinjak’s apology and legal fallout in Tomislav Mrkonjić case Karlobag.eu / illustration

Babić’s statement after the incident at the Goat League further intensified the debate about violence on the sports field

The incident at the finals of the Goat League futsal tournament in Zagreb, in which bare-knuckle boxer Marko Martinjak headbutted footballer Tomislav Mrkonjić, took on a new dimension after the public statement by MMA coach Goran Babić Hambi. Instead of easing tensions after an event that ended with the final being stopped, one team being disqualified, police action and confirmed serious injuries, Babić’s reaction opened an additional debate about attitudes toward violence, the responsibility of professional fighters and the limits of public comment on injuries. According to published information, Babić came to Martinjak’s defense, describing him as a “good guy” and a “king”, while sending a message to the injured Mrkonjić to get in touch if he was seeking money for “emotional distress”. In doing so, according to the same reports, he downplayed the possible consequences of the injury by claiming that even a potential operation would heal quickly. Such a tone resonated particularly strongly because it came after an event that the police and judicial authorities no longer treat merely as a sporting incident, but as the subject of a criminal investigation on suspicion of the criminal offense of serious bodily injury.

What happened in the Goat League final

According to information published by Zagreb media citing the police, the incident happened on Sunday, 31 May 2026, at around 9:30 p.m. in Peščenica, on a sports ground in Hermana Bužana Street, during a sporting match. The police stated that a 36-year-old man struck a 32-year-old man head-to-head, and the injured man received medical assistance at the University Hospital Centre Zagreb, where it was established that he had been seriously injured. After the criminal investigation, according to the statement carried by the media, a criminal complaint was filed against the suspect with the competent state attorney’s office, and he was handed over to the detention supervisor. Tportal reported that the investigating judge accepted the prosecution’s proposal and ordered investigative detention because of the danger of reoffending. In that way, the case moved beyond the framework of a heated finale to an amateur or recreational competition and entered judicial procedure, in which the circumstances of the event will be established through official channels.

Sportske novosti and other media reported that Martinjak competed in the tournament as a representative of one of the finalist teams, while Mrkonjić played for the opposing team Sokol Hef. After a verbal conflict, Martinjak approached him and struck him with his head, and footage of the incident that spread across social media and news portals showed Mrkonjić falling to the ground after the blow. Reports also state that after he fell, a ball was kicked toward him, which further intensified the negative public reaction. The match was interrupted, and the organizers registered the final by official decision and disqualified the team connected with the incident. According to a statement by GOAT League and SC Klinček, the organizers distanced themselves from inappropriate behavior, insults, threats and actions that undermine the integrity of the competition, the sporting spirit and fair play.

Babić’s defense of Martinjak sparked a new wave of reactions

Babić’s statement appeared at a moment when the public was already debating the attack itself, Martinjak’s responsibility and the severity of the injuries sustained by Mrkonjić. According to the 24sata article, Babić posted on Instagram, where he has more than 20,000 followers, and used insulting expressions toward the injured footballer in the post. In that reaction, he disputed the manner in which Mrkonjić’s team had come to victory after the opponent’s disqualification, and the statement was also directed against a possible subsequent legal or compensation-related response by the injured player. The publicly reported reaction also states that Babić defended Martinjak by saying he was a “good guy and king”, while telling Mrkonjić to get in touch if he wanted money for “emotional distress”. In the same context, the downplaying of the injury through the claim that even surgery, if needed, would quickly be resolved is also problematic.

Such statements do not change the legal status of the event itself, but they can influence the broader social impression of the incident. When a public figure from combat sports places personal loyalty to the attacker at the forefront, rather than the seriousness of the injury and the need for accountability, the debate shifts from facts to fan-like taking of sides. In this case, it is especially sensitive that Martinjak is not merely a participant in a futsal tournament, but a professional fighter whose career has been built in sports in which physical strength is part of competitive identity. For that reason, the public often expects a higher level of self-control from professional fighters outside the arena, especially in situations involving a recreational or charity-popular sporting setting. Babić’s relativization of the attack was therefore understood as a message that ignores the difference between combat sport with rules and a physical confrontation outside the fighting arena.

Martinjak’s apology and his version of events

After the incident, Martinjak publicly apologized. Index carried his post in which he wrote that he expressed sincere regret for the incident during the Goat League finals, that his behavior had been inappropriate and that, as a professional athlete, he must be an example of self-control and sporting conduct regardless of the circumstances. In the apology, he stated that he was sorry Tomislav Mrkonjić had been injured and wished him a quick and successful recovery. He also said that he personally accepted responsibility for his reaction and that he should have acted differently. That apology followed an earlier comment in which Martinjak claimed that he had been provoked, that Mrkonjić had mentioned his mother and insulted him, and that he had reacted in the “heat of the moment”.

These two elements, the apology and the explanation, were received differently by the public. Some comments focused on the alleged provocations that preceded the blow, while others emphasized that provocation cannot justify a physical attack, especially when it is committed by a professional fighter. According to tportal’s report, when Martinjak arrived at court and was asked by an RTL journalist whether he was sorry, he answered that he was. But the legal process does not depend on public apologies, but on evidence, medical documentation, witness statements and the assessment of the competent authorities. That is precisely why the organizers, participants and the public are now following two separate processes: the sports-organizational one, which has already resulted in disqualification and condemnation of the behavior, and the criminal-law one, which will determine whether criminal liability exists and to what extent.

Serious bodily injury and the legal framework

According to reports citing the police, Mrkonjić was diagnosed with a serious injury at KBC Zagreb. In the Croatian Criminal Code, the criminal offense of serious bodily injury is regulated by Article 118, according to which a person who seriously injures another person or seriously impairs that person’s health may be punished by imprisonment from six months to five years. This does not mean that the outcome of any individual case is predetermined, but that this is the legal framework within which the competent authorities qualify the act, and the court, if proceedings and a judgment occur, assesses responsibility and punishment according to the established circumstances. In this case, according to media reports, the police completed the criminal investigation and filed a criminal complaint, which is the initial stage of criminal action. Further steps depend on the state attorney’s office, the court and the evidence collected during the proceedings.

The ordering of investigative detention, reported by tportal and other media, does not represent a decision on guilt. It is a measure that the court may order when the legal conditions are met, for example because of the danger of reoffending, influence on witnesses or other reasons prescribed by the Criminal Procedure Act. According to the available information in this case, investigative detention was ordered because of the danger of reoffending. Such a measure often appears to the public as a final judgment, but it is a procedural decision and does not change the presumption of innocence. At this stage, Martinjak must be considered innocent until any guilt is established by a final court decision.

Mrkonjić’s sporting path and the consequences for the tournament

Tomislav Mrkonjić is a footballer who has played for several clubs in Croatia and abroad during his career. HŠK Posušje announced in January 2025 that Mrkonjić had signed for the club, and the announcement stated that he had previously played for PEC Zwolle and that in his career he had worn the jerseys of GNK Dinamo, HNK Hajduk, NK Croatia Zmijavci, NK Imotski, RNK Split, NK Rudeš and NK Radomlje. That is precisely why the incident attracted attention beyond the framework of the tournament itself, because it was not just an anonymous recreational match, but a competition featuring former and current athletes and people known from public life. Index stated that well-known footballers such as Niko Kranjčar, Mario Mandžukić, Milan Badelj and Josip Pivarić had also previously played at Klinček as part of the Goat League. Such a tournament profile further increases the responsibility of organizers and participants because the event has visibility significantly greater than that of an ordinary local competition.

For the organizers, the most important question is how to protect the credibility of the competition and the safety of participants after such an incident. GOAT League and SC Klinček have already said that they distance themselves from behavior that undermines the sporting spirit and fair play and that no one is above the rules of the competition. That message is important because amateur and semi-professional competitions often rest on a combination of competitive intensity, entertainment and the reputation of participants, but precisely for that reason they must react clearly when a situation crosses the line of what is permitted. The interruption of the final and the disqualification show that the organizers immediately applied sporting sanctions, and 24sata also reported that after the incident Martinjak was stripped of his title in the Arena Golden Fight organization. A broader debate is now taking place about the prevention of similar situations. In practice, this may include stricter rules of conduct for team representatives, clearer protocols for stopping a match and faster physical protection of participants in the event of escalation.

A professional fighter outside the ring

Marko Martinjak is one of the best-known regional bare-knuckle fighters. According to the profile of the BYB/BKB organization, he competes under the nickname “Marvelous”, fights out of Zagreb and was the holder of the bridgerweight belt, while the media had previously highlighted his titles in several categories and a large number of knockout victories. It is precisely such a career that makes this case different from a typical incident at a futsal tournament. A professional fighter possesses experience, technique and physical strength that, in a regulated fighting arena, are permitted only under rules, with a referee, protective procedures and the consent of the opponent. When the same person finds himself in a conflict outside the ring, the public is justified in viewing his behavior through a stricter criterion of self-control.

That is why Babić’s statement also cannot be viewed merely as private support for an acquaintance. When a coach from the combat-sports milieu calls an injured participant derogatory names or relativizes the consequences of the blow, a message is sent that is contrary to what sport, including combat sports, formally represents: discipline, control, respect for rules and responsibility for one’s own behavior. Combat sports often defend themselves against stereotypes that they encourage violence precisely by emphasizing strict discipline and clear boundaries between fighting and violence. Such public statements can therefore harm not only individuals, but also the perception of the entire scene. The debate that developed after the Goat League shows how thin the line is between sporting rivalry, public spectacle and a real threat to safety when control over reactions is absent.

The public debate now goes beyond the match itself

The Goat League case showed how an incident on the field can, within a few hours, turn into a topic encompassing sport, criminal law, public communication and the responsibility of well-known figures. The injury to Tomislav Mrkonjić and the proceedings against Marko Martinjak remain in the foreground, but Babić’s reaction opened an additional question: why, in part of the public, is a physical attack being presented as an acceptable response to a verbal conflict? Such an interpretation is especially problematic in a sporting environment, where emotions, rivalry and provocations cannot be completely avoided, but violence must be clearly sanctioned. The organizers have already implemented their sporting measures, the police have initiated action, and the judiciary will decide on the criminal-law consequences. In the meantime, public actors commenting on the case have a responsibility not to encourage further humiliation of the injured person and not to turn violence into a matter of fan loyalty.

Sources:
- 24sata – report on Babić’s reaction, Martinjak’s apology, the status of investigative detention and the stripping of the title (link)
- 24sata – police data on the time, place of the event, injury and arrest of the suspect (link)
- tportal – report on the court’s decision on investigative detention and the relayed police statement (link)
- Index – Martinjak’s public apology and the context of the Goat League tournament (link)
- Sportske novosti – statement by the organizers of GOAT League and SC Klinček and description of the interruption of the final (link)
- Narodne novine – Criminal Code, Article 118 on serious bodily injury (link)
- HŠK Posušje – announcement on the signing of Tomislav Mrkonjić and his previous sporting path (link)
- BYB/BKB Bare Knuckle – official profile of Marko Martinjak in the BYB/BKB organization (link)

PARTNER

Croatia

Check accommodation
Tags Goat League Marko Martinjak Tomislav Mrkonjić Goran Babić Hambi futsal tournament serious bodily injury investigative detention futsal sports incident fair play
RECOMMENDED ACCOMMODATION

Croatia

Check accommodation

Newsletter — top events of the week

One email per week: top events, concerts, sports matches, price drop alerts. Nothing more.

No spam. One-click unsubscribe. GDPR compliant.