Postavke privatnosti

Mild brain injury increases the risk of Alzheimer's disease and reveals the hidden role of brain lymphatic drainage

New research from the University of Virginia reveals how even a single mild traumatic brain injury can trigger changes in brain lymphatic drainage, accelerate the accumulation of tau protein, and increase the risk of Alzheimer's disease decades after the injury. The findings emphasize the importance of concussion prevention and early recognition of long-term consequences.

Photo by: Domagoj Skledar - illustration/ arhiva (vlastita)

Mild Brain Injury as a Trigger for Dementia


Mild traumatic brain injury – for example, a "simple" concussion after a fall, traffic accident, or sports blow – is commonly perceived as a passing problem that will resolve with a few days of rest. However, new research from the University of Virginia (UVA) shows that even a single such injury can trigger a silent, long-term process in the brain that increases the risk of developing Alzheimer's disease decades later. This is work that not only offers an explanation for the link between traumatic brain injury and dementia but also opens an unexpected therapeutic target: the brain's hidden lymphatic "drain".


Risk of Alzheimer's Disease After Traumatic Brain Injury


Alzheimer's disease is already responsible for a large proportion of dementia cases worldwide, and estimates suggest that more than 55 million people live with dementia, with the number of sufferers increasing rapidly as the population ages. At the same time, traumatic brain injury is one of the most common neurological injuries – it is estimated that tens of millions of people worldwide experience some variant of head injury every year, ranging from mild concussions to severe injuries accompanied by loss of consciousness and surgical interventions. The combination of these two facts – the increasing burden of dementia and the high frequency of head injuries – turns understanding their relationship into a matter of public health, not just academic curiosity.


In the last decade, a series of epidemiological studies have confirmed that people who have suffered a traumatic brain injury have a higher risk of developing dementia, including Alzheimer's disease. A large meta-analysis of cohort studies published in 2021 included more than 4.2 million subjects and showed that individuals with a history of traumatic brain injury have, on average, about a 17 percent higher relative risk for Alzheimer's disease. Moreover, this risk was even more pronounced in moderate and severe injuries. Research published in recent years has further confirmed that traumatic brain injury can double or triple the overall risk of dementia, especially if the injury is repeated or occurs in combination with other risk factors, such as diabetes or cardiovascular diseases.


Despite this clear epidemiological signal, it remained unclear for a long time exactly which biological mechanisms are responsible for the transition from "one blow to the head" to the gradual deterioration of nerve cells and memory loss decades later. This very gap is beginning to be filled by a team led by neuroimmunologist John Lukens, director of the Harrison Family Translational Research Center for Alzheimer’s and Neurodegenerative Diseases at the Paul and Diane Manning Institute for Biotechnology at UVA. Their latest results suggest that a key role is played by the brain's drainage system – a fine network of lymphatic vessels hidden in the brain's membranes, which were considered non-existent just a decade ago.


The Brain's Hidden Lymphatic Drain


The revolution began in 2015, when scientists from UVA first described the so-called meningeal lymphatic vessels – classic lymphatic blood vessels located along the brain membranes, which drain excess fluid, immune cells, and metabolic waste from the central nervous system towards the deep cervical lymph nodes. Until then, it was taught that the brain does not have its own lymphatic system, which supported the idea that it is an "immunologically privileged" organ isolated from intense immune system surveillance. The discovery of lymphatic vessels in the brain membranes literally changed textbooks and opened a completely new perspective: if the brain has its own drainage system, what happens when that system fails?


The answer proves particularly important in neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's. In Alzheimer's disease, two key pathological proteins gradually accumulate in the brain – beta-amyloid, which forms plaques between neurons, and tau, which forms so-called neurofibrillary tangles inside nerve cells. Both proteins exist under normal circumstances and have their role, but when their metabolism and removal are disrupted, they begin to accumulate in toxic forms. In recent years, there is increasing evidence that precisely the lymphatic drainage of the brain, together with the so-called glymphatic system, participates in the removal of these proteins and other waste substances from brain tissue.


What the New UVA Research Showed


The new UVA research builds on this discovery and shows that even a single mild traumatic brain injury can impair the function of these lymphatic vessels. Scientists used a mouse model prone to developing tauopathy, i.e., diseases in which pathological tau accumulates in the brain, which is also typical for Alzheimer's disease. After a single mild head injury – an injury that, translated to humans, would correspond to a concussion without dramatic neurosurgical complications – permanent disturbances in the work of meningeal lymphatic vessels were recorded in the animals' brains. The drainage of brain fluid was slowed down, and the lymphatic flow towards the cervical lymph nodes was weakened.


At the same time, the accumulation of tau protein accelerated, and not only at the site of the injury itself. Pathological tau began to spread to other regions, associated with memory, spatial orientation, and decision-making. Over time, signs of neurodegeneration developed in the brain – loss of neurons, damage to synaptic connections, and disturbances in brain networks involved in cognitive functions. In other words, what started as a "mild" concussion left a long trail that looked like the early stages of Alzheimer's disease.


The Role of Immune Cells and Chronic Inflammation


The research team did not stop at merely observing the damage. In parallel, they monitored the behavior of key immune cells that participate in the response to injury – primarily macrophages and microglia. In a healthy brain, these cells help remove dead cells and waste, monitor infections, and contribute to recovery after micro-traumas. But under certain circumstances, this same immune mechanism can become a chronic source of inflammation. After a mild traumatic injury, researchers observed that macrophages in the area of meningeal lymphatic vessels change their "program," shifting into a state that promotes long-term inflammation and further impairs drainage function. Such a combination – weaker waste drainage and increased inflammation – creates, figuratively speaking, a perfect storm for the accelerated accumulation of pathological tau protein.


Experimental Approaches and Limitations of Application


On the trail of these observations, a key question arose: can the impaired lymphatic system of the brain be "restarted" after an injury and thereby reduce the risk of a later neurodegenerative process? The answer was sought in the molecule VEGF-C (vascular endothelial growth factor C), a natural growth factor that promotes the development and expansion of lymphatic vessels. In a series of experiments on mice, researchers introduced VEGF-C into the meningeal membranes within the first 24 hours after injury using a harmless viral particle that serves as an "empty shell" for delivering genetic instructions.


The result was twofold. On the one hand, meningeal lymphatic vessels became wider and functionally more active after treatment – the drainage of cerebrospinal fluid and waste proteins towards the lymph nodes improved. On the other hand, animals that received VEGF-C showed significantly less accumulation of pathological tau protein, fewer signs of neurodegeneration, and better results in memory and learning tests compared to untreated mice. In other words, the accelerated "repair" of the brain's lymphatic drainage system immediately after injury protected the brain from the later development of changes resembling Alzheimer's disease.


Such results suggest that impaired brain drainage could be the link connecting traumatic injury with the long-term risk of Alzheimer's disease. Conceptually, this changes the perspective on traumatic brain injuries: instead of viewing them exclusively as an acute mechanical problem – impact, swelling, bleeding – it is becoming increasingly clear that TBI triggers a long-term cascade of immune and vascular changes. In this cascade, meningeal lymphatic vessels and surrounding immune cells appear as a key "regulatory valve" that decides whether the brain will successfully clean and calm itself or if chronic inflammation and accumulation of toxic proteins will smolder within it.


It is important to emphasize that the described experiments relate to animal models and that such an approach cannot simply be transferred to humans. The application of viral vectors carrying genes for growth factors raises a series of safety and ethical questions, and before potential clinical application, it is necessary to go through a long process of additional preclinical trials and phased clinical studies. Nevertheless, the fact that intervention within the first day after injury was sufficient to change the long-term outcome in animals opens a new idea: perhaps after a traumatic brain injury, it is possible to utilize a "window of opportunity" in which targeted improvement of drainage and modulation of the immune response can reduce the risk of later dementia.


Long-term Consequences of TBI and Connection to Other Diseases


This conclusion fits well into the broader picture provided by newer literature reviews on traumatic brain injury and neurodegeneration. It is increasingly clear that TBI is not a one-time event that ends upon leaving the hospital, but the beginning of a chronic process. Numerous studies indicate that survivors of moderate and severe brain injuries have a multiple times higher risk of developing dementia compared to persons with other forms of physical trauma without head involvement. Especially at risk are those who have experienced repeated mild injuries – for example, professional athletes in contact sports or persons exposed to explosions in war zones – in whom chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) can develop years after exposure ceases, with behavioral changes, mood disorders, and gradual cognitive decline.


TBI is not only associated with Alzheimer's disease. Epidemiological data also suggest an increased risk of developing Parkinson's disease, certain forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and other tauopathies. Although individual mechanisms vary from disease to disease, the common denominator is often chronic neuroinflammation and impaired removal of toxic proteins. Recent papers on brain tissue samples from persons with CTE suggest that repeated head injuries encourage long-term activation of microglia, oxidative DNA damage, and changes in gene expression that further worsen neurons, regardless of classic tau protein accumulations. All this fits into the picture according to which the brain after TBI is "shifted" into a new, unstable state in which it is significantly more sensitive to other harmful influences throughout life.


What This Means for Clinical Practice and Public Health


It is therefore not surprising that international guidelines increasingly emphasize the importance of long-term monitoring of persons with a history of traumatic brain injury, even when it comes to seemingly mild incidents. In practice, this means a more careful assessment of cognitive functions in the years following the injury, especially in people who have additional risk factors: a positive family history of Alzheimer's disease, presence of the APOE ε4 allele, diabetes, untreated hypertension, chronic depression, or long-term exposure to polluted air. These are all factors that have been shown to increase the risk of dementia on their own, and in combination with TBI, they can have a synergistic effect.


When viewed from a public health perspective, new insights into the role of the meningeal lymphatic system further reinforce the message that preventing head injuries remains a fundamental strategy. In sports, this includes stricter protocols for returning to play after a concussion, limiting the number of head impacts in training, replacing more dangerous drills with safer techniques, and systematic symptom monitoring. In traffic, the emphasis is on wearing helmets, using seat belts, and reducing speed, while in the work environment, the use of protective equipment on construction sites and in industry is key. Every prevented concussion is potentially a reduced risk of future dementia.


On the other hand, for persons who have already experienced a traumatic brain injury, the focus shifts to optimizing recovery and reducing the cumulative burden on the brain. This implies consistent adherence to instructions on rest and gradual return to cognitive and physical activities, but also active work on controlling other risk factors for dementia. Regular physical activity, a healthy diet, cessation of smoking, control of blood pressure and sugar, treatment of sleep disorders and depression, and cognitive engagement (learning, social activities, mental challenges) remain interventions with the most evidence that they can positively affect brain health in the long run.


Translational Research and Future Directions


The new UVA research is situated within a broader framework of translational efforts aimed at Alzheimer's disease. The Harrison Family Translational Research Center, managed by Lukens, was founded precisely with the aim of shortening the path from fundamental discoveries to concrete therapeutic approaches. This includes the development of advanced laboratory models, collaboration with clinicians who monitor patients with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's, and collaboration with industry and regulatory agencies so that potential therapies can be tested as quickly, but also as safely as possible, in controlled conditions. In the background of such projects stands a complex funding network – from the US Department of Defense, through the National Institutes of Health and international foundations, to donations from families who have experienced Alzheimer's disease firsthand.


An important aspect of this story is the increasing recognition of the brain's lymphatic system as a therapeutic target in various neurological conditions. Experimental work on animals shows that stimulating meningeal lymphatic drainage can improve the response to brain tumor immunotherapy, reduce neuroinflammation after injury, and improve cognitive functions in models of aging and Alzheimer's disease. At the same time, there are papers warning that excessive or untimely activation of lymphatic vessels can have unwanted consequences, for example, increasing the penetration of inflammatory signals from the periphery into the brain. Therefore, there is increasing talk today about the need for precise, temporally and spatially targeted modulation of the lymphatic system, rather than simple "drainage boosting" in every case.


Why It Is Important to Take Every Concussion Seriously


For an individual who has experienced a concussion, all these molecular and vascular details may be difficult to connect with their own experience of headache, dizziness, or short-term loss of consciousness. But the basic message is actually intuitive: the brain does not have an unlimited ability to withstand blows. Every traumatic injury, even one that seems mild, leaves a trace in the fine structures of the nervous and lymphatic systems. New research, like this one from UVA, helps us see that trace for the first time at the level of vessels and immune cells, before it turns into a clinically obvious decline in memory and functional ability in later age.


As such knowledge penetrates clinical practice, we will likely witness changes in the way doctors assess and monitor patients after a head injury. In an ideal scenario, the standard workup for a concussion in the future could include not only a neurological examination and classic imaging tests but also specific biomarkers of lymphatic and glymphatic system damage, more sophisticated cognition tests, and a personalized assessment of the long-term risk of dementia. Such an approach requires significant investments, but also the political will to place brain health preservation high on the list of public health priorities.


For now, the most important practical conclusion remains twofold: prevent every traumatic brain injury as much as possible and take every injury that occurs seriously. What was once considered a "harmless" blow to the head is today, thanks to a combination of epidemiology and advanced biomedical science, increasingly recognized as the potential beginning of a slow path towards neurodegenerative disease. Although there is no magic injection yet that will repair the brain's lymphatic drainage after an injury, understanding this system gives new hope that future therapies will be able to targetedly protect the most sensitive human organ – the brain – from the long-term consequences of a moment of carelessness, a sports accident, or armed conflict.

Find accommodation nearby

Creation time: 9 hours ago

Science & tech desk

Our Science and Technology Editorial Desk was born from a long-standing passion for exploring, interpreting, and bringing complex topics closer to everyday readers. It is written by employees and volunteers who have followed the development of science and technological innovation for decades, from laboratory discoveries to solutions that change daily life. Although we write in the plural, every article is authored by a real person with extensive editorial and journalistic experience, and deep respect for facts and verifiable information.

Our editorial team bases its work on the belief that science is strongest when it is accessible to everyone. That is why we strive for clarity, precision, and readability, without oversimplifying in a way that would compromise the quality of the content. We often spend hours studying research papers, technical documents, and expert sources in order to present each topic in a way that will interest rather than burden the reader. In every article, we aim to connect scientific insights with real life, showing how ideas from research centres, universities, and technology labs shape the world around us.

Our long experience in journalism allows us to recognize what is truly important for the reader, whether it is progress in artificial intelligence, medical breakthroughs, energy solutions, space missions, or devices that enter our everyday lives before we even imagine their possibilities. Our view of technology is not purely technical; we are also interested in the human stories behind major advances – researchers who spend years completing projects, engineers who turn ideas into functional systems, and visionaries who push the boundaries of what is possible.

A strong sense of responsibility guides our work as well. We want readers to trust the information we provide, so we verify sources, compare data, and avoid rushing to publish when something is not fully clear. Trust is built more slowly than news is written, but we believe that only such journalism has lasting value.

To us, technology is more than devices, and science is more than theory. These are fields that drive progress, shape society, and create new opportunities for everyone who wants to understand how the world works today and where it is heading tomorrow. That is why we approach every topic with seriousness but also with curiosity, because curiosity opens the door to the best stories.

Our mission is to bring readers closer to a world that is changing faster than ever before, with the conviction that quality journalism can be a bridge between experts, innovators, and all those who want to understand what happens behind the headlines. In this we see our true task: to transform the complex into the understandable, the distant into the familiar, and the unknown into the inspiring.

NOTE FOR OUR READERS
Karlobag.eu provides news, analyses and information on global events and topics of interest to readers worldwide. All published information is for informational purposes only.
We emphasize that we are not experts in scientific, medical, financial or legal fields. Therefore, before making any decisions based on the information from our portal, we recommend that you consult with qualified experts.
Karlobag.eu may contain links to external third-party sites, including affiliate links and sponsored content. If you purchase a product or service through these links, we may earn a commission. We have no control over the content or policies of these sites and assume no responsibility for their accuracy, availability or any transactions conducted through them.
If we publish information about events or ticket sales, please note that we do not sell tickets either directly or via intermediaries. Our portal solely informs readers about events and purchasing opportunities through external sales platforms. We connect readers with partners offering ticket sales services, but do not guarantee their availability, prices or purchase conditions. All ticket information is obtained from third parties and may be subject to change without prior notice. We recommend that you thoroughly check the sales conditions with the selected partner before any purchase, as the Karlobag.eu portal does not assume responsibility for transactions or ticket sale conditions.
All information on our portal is subject to change without prior notice. By using this portal, you agree to read the content at your own risk.