The Editorial Office for Public Process Oversight is dedicated to monitoring how institutions make decisions, spend resources, and manage funds that belong to everyone. Our editorial work has developed over the years through researching public tenders, analysing documentation, following long-term procedures, and speaking with people involved in state and local administration systems. Through this experience, an editorial approach has emerged based on patient understanding of processes, comparing data, and constantly questioning the decisions that shape public life.
Our work relies on more than three decades of professional journalistic experience, with a clear awareness that public systems are complex and often opaque. That is why we strive to place every piece of information in context: who makes decisions, why a particular procedure is carried out, what is written in the documents, and what can be read between the lines. In every report, we aim to provide readers with an overview that is not just a simple transfer of news but a reconstruction of how a decision was made and an explanation of its real impact.
We pay special attention to precision. Public procurement, project financing, allocation of grants, budget amendments, and administrative procedures are not topics that can be covered superficially. They require careful verification, understanding of documentation, and the experience of someone who can identify inconsistencies, risks, and signs that something may not be functioning as it should. We want to give readers a clear picture — without dramatic tones, but with enough depth for them to judge whether a particular process was conducted transparently and in the public interest.
Our editorial office develops content that fosters trust — not through grand words but through a consistent relationship with facts. We work quietly and patiently, aware that journalism focused on supervising public processes is, above all, a responsibility toward the citizens whose money is being used. Each text arises from the conviction that the public system must be clear and understandable, and that the role of journalists is to uncover what is overlooked, explain what is buried in documents, and highlight decisions that shape everyday life.
The Editorial Office for Public Process Oversight therefore writes without sensationalism, without hiding behind vague phrases, and without giving up when procedures are difficult or slow. Our mission is to provide readers with a reliable orientation in the world of public decision-making — a space where experience, knowledge, and commitment to transparency come together.