Postavke privatnosti

U.N. calls on U.S. to end embargo on Cuba that has blocked access to essential resources for decades

The U.N. General Assembly is again calling for the lifting of the U.S. embargo on Cuba, arguing that the sanctions are hampering access to food, medicine and other essential resources. The embargo has been restricting essential resources in Cuba for decades, raising concerns among many UN member states about its negative effects on basic human rights and sovereignty.

U.N. calls on U.S. to end embargo on Cuba that has blocked access to essential resources for decades
Photo by: Domagoj Skledar/ arhiva (vlastita)

The General Assembly of the United Nations has once again brought together representatives of states to discuss the long-standing embargo imposed by the United States on Cuba in recent days. With a large majority of votes, a resolution calling for the immediate lifting of this embargo was once again adopted, which has become one of the longest sanctions regimes in modern history. This measure, which has been in place since the early 1960s, has almost completely isolated Cuba on a global economic level, restricting its access to markets, trade partners, and essential resources necessary for the stable development of the economy. The embargo is referred to in discussions as a form of "economic aggression" that has hampered Cuba's growth for decades and affected all segments of its society.


How the embargo affects the daily life of Cubans


The embargo has significantly hindered the lives of ordinary citizens in Cuba over the years. According to representatives from Cuba at the UN, the embargo does not only block trade but also access to healthcare, food products, and basic necessities. For example, due to the inability to freely import medicines, many patients with chronic diseases are left without appropriate therapies. Representatives from Caribbean and Latin American countries have noted that the inhumanity of such an embargo is particularly visible in moments of global health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, when Cuba was unable to import respirators and other essential medical devices. In such situations, the embargo is not only an economic measure but also an obstacle that calls into question basic human rights and the right to life. Additionally, due to limited access to markets, Cubans are forced to resort to alternative and often more expensive methods of obtaining basic necessities, further exacerbating an already difficult economic situation.


International pressure on the USA due to the embargo


During the debate at the General Assembly, numerous member states reiterated their call for the United States to end the embargo and allow Cuba free trade and access to global financial institutions. Vietnam, China, Russia, and a number of other countries emphasized that the embargo violates the principles of sovereign equality, which is one of the fundamental principles of the United Nations Charter. A representative from Brazil highlighted that sanctions contradict the goals of sustainable development and that it is important to allow Cuba access to international aid so that the country can improve its capacities in agriculture, education, and healthcare. The United Nations has been adopting resolutions calling for the lifting of this embargo for years, but the United States continues to reject these calls, citing a desire for democratization in Cuba and the protection of human rights for Cubans as reasons. However, critics argue that such a policy actually makes life difficult for ordinary people while simultaneously not contributing to political stability.


Cuba's recognition for international aid


Despite the embargo, Cuba has maintained its position as an international leader in providing medical assistance to other countries over the years. During the pandemic, Cuban doctors provided medical aid to numerous countries around the world, including those hardest hit by the crisis. Many countries in the discussion pointed out that Cuba's approach demonstrated the importance of multilateralism and international cooperation, emphasizing that the embargo prevents Cuba from further developing its medical and scientific capacities. Representatives of African nations particularly praised Cuba's contributions to the development of healthcare systems in Africa, and it was noted that lifting the embargo would allow for additional programs and collaborations that would benefit the entire international community.


The USA defends its policy


American representatives at the UN argue that the sanctions aim to encourage democratic reforms in Cuba and support the aspirations of Cubans for freedom and prosperity. They state that the embargo includes certain exceptions, such as for humanitarian shipments of food and medicines, but add that the policy toward Cuba is focused on protecting human rights. Critics believe that this stance is not in line with the actual effects of the embargo, and that the embargo primarily impacts ordinary citizens. Although the United States and Cuba re-established diplomatic relations in 2015, economic sanctions remain in place, and the USA still lists Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism. This measure further complicates Cuba's economic relations with other countries and poses an obstacle to greater integration of Cuba into the global economic system.


Increase in supporters for lifting the embargo


According to recent statistics, the majority of UN member states support lifting the embargo, and this year's resolution passed with an overwhelming majority of votes in the General Assembly. Many countries believe that the embargo represents an "anachronism of Cold War politics" that no longer has a place in the modern world. The embargo not only blocks economic exchange but also prevents Cuba from achieving sustainable development goals and reducing poverty. Additionally, delegates emphasized that the embargo contributes to global shortages, particularly in food and energy sectors, and that lifting the embargo is crucial for the stability of international markets and addressing food insecurity issues. This argument gains weight considering the current global challenges, including the growing food shortages and energy crises.


Final thought on the long-lasting embargo


While the United States remains determined in its policy toward Cuba, the international community is increasingly calling for the lifting of the embargo. The UN General Assembly will continue to be a platform where this topic is reopened year after year, and pressure on the USA is rising. Although the embargo on Cuba has occasionally changed through various phases, the underlying problems it creates remain unchanged. Cuba continues to suffer the consequences in almost all sectors of its economy, and its ability to cope with global challenges, such as pandemics and natural disasters, remains significantly diminished due to economic restrictions. Therefore, many experts and international actors believe that lifting the embargo would not only contribute to Cuba's prosperity but also strengthen the global sense of solidarity and cooperation, which are the key goals of the United Nations themselves.

Find accommodation nearby

Creation time: 31 October, 2024

Political desk

The political desk shapes its content with the belief that responsible writing and a solid understanding of social processes hold essential value in the public sphere. For years, we have been analyzing political events, monitoring changes that affect citizens, and reflecting on the relationships between institutions, individuals, and the international community. Our approach is based on experience gained through long-term work in journalism and direct observation of political scenes in different countries and systems.

In our editorial work, we emphasize context, because we know that politics is never just the news of the day. Behind every move, statement, or decision are circumstances that define its true significance, and our task is to bring readers closer to the background and intentions that are not visible at first glance. In our articles, we strive to build a vivid picture of society – its tensions, ambitions, problems, and those moments when opportunities for change arise.

Over the years, we have learned that political reporting is not reduced to retelling conferences and press releases. It requires patience, observation, and a willingness to compare various sources, assess credibility, recognize patterns of behavior, and find meaning in actions that sometimes seem contradictory. To achieve this, we rely on experience gained through long-term work with public institutions, civil society organizations, analysts, and individuals who shape political reality through their activities.

Our writing stems from personal fieldwork: from conventions, protests, parliamentary sessions, international forums, and conversations with people who experience politics from within. These encounters shape texts in which we strive to be clear, precise, and fair, without dramatizing and without deviating from facts. We want the reader to feel informed, not overwhelmed, and to receive a picture that enables them to independently assess what a given decision means for their everyday life.

The political desk believes in the importance of open and responsible journalism. In a world full of quick reactions and sensationalism, we choose diligent, long-term work on texts that offer a broader perspective. It is a slower path, but the only one that ensures content that is thorough, credible, and in the service of the reader. Our approach has grown from decades of experience and the conviction that an informed citizen is the strongest guardian of democratic processes.

That is why our publications do not merely follow the daily news cycle. They seek to understand what political events truly mean, where they lead, and how they fit into the broader picture of international relations. We write with respect for the reader and with the awareness that politics is not an isolated field, but a space where economy, culture, identity, security, and the individual life of each person intersect.

NOTE FOR OUR READERS
Karlobag.eu provides news, analyses and information on global events and topics of interest to readers worldwide. All published information is for informational purposes only.
We emphasize that we are not experts in scientific, medical, financial or legal fields. Therefore, before making any decisions based on the information from our portal, we recommend that you consult with qualified experts.
Karlobag.eu may contain links to external third-party sites, including affiliate links and sponsored content. If you purchase a product or service through these links, we may earn a commission. We have no control over the content or policies of these sites and assume no responsibility for their accuracy, availability or any transactions conducted through them.
If we publish information about events or ticket sales, please note that we do not sell tickets either directly or via intermediaries. Our portal solely informs readers about events and purchasing opportunities through external sales platforms. We connect readers with partners offering ticket sales services, but do not guarantee their availability, prices or purchase conditions. All ticket information is obtained from third parties and may be subject to change without prior notice. We recommend that you thoroughly check the sales conditions with the selected partner before any purchase, as the Karlobag.eu portal does not assume responsibility for transactions or ticket sale conditions.
All information on our portal is subject to change without prior notice. By using this portal, you agree to read the content at your own risk.