Postavke privatnosti

Trump's social media presence has sparked controversy and division in U.S. society.

Donald Trump, with his intense presence on social networks, is creating a wave of public reactions. His posts about alleged fraud in the electoral process and conspiracy theories further divide American society and polarize opinions. With more than 330 posts supporting conspiracy theories, Trump's activity is creating distrust in the election process and reinforcing divisions among voters.

Trump
Photo by: Domagoj Skledar/ arhiva (vlastita)

Trump's activity on social media sparks controversy


Donald Trump, former president of the United States and current candidate for the 2024 presidential election, is once again attracting public attention with his pronounced presence on social media, especially on the Truth Social platform. Over the past few months, Trump has posted hundreds of updates, the majority of which contained claims about alleged electoral fraud and conspiracy theories. An analysis by the New York Times revealed that Trump published over 330 posts mentioning a “secret plan” against him or the American people from March to September. Additionally, he regularly uses phrases and symbols related to QAnon, including accusations against billionaire George Soros as the main culprit behind the alleged plans against him.


Trump's activities on Truth Social, where he has nearly eight million followers, represent a platform for spreading claims that undermine the integrity of the American electoral process. Numerous posts are directed towards the narrative of a “deep state” that, according to him, manipulates elections, including claims about illegal immigrants and false accusations within the judicial system. His message about fighting “fraud” in elections resonates with his supporters and many right-wing groups that amplify this narrative on social media platforms like Gettr and Rumble, as well as mainstream platforms like Facebook and X.


A new wave of conspiracy theories about electoral fraud


With the increasing number of posts and repeated claims, Trump's posts are just one component of a larger web of misinformation that has grown since the 2020 elections. For example, last week a video was posted in Pennsylvania that, according to pro-Trump networks, shows “the destruction of votes” for Trump, which the FBI later confirmed as part of foreign attempts to influence the elections. Official American intelligence agencies, including the FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), highlighted that such content is used to raise doubts about the security of the elections. The video, reportedly, was part of a campaign from Russia that focused on spreading distrust in the electoral process and division among Americans.


Supporters and media networks connected to Trump are also working to promote similar theories, further amplifying the impact of Trump's posts. Besides Trump posting himself, he often shares content from anonymous sources that include graphics and dubious data. Many of these profiles post derogatory comments about his opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, as well as manipulated photographs and videos that further fan the flames of existing conspiracy theories.


Negative impact on the electoral process and public opinion


As the American public prepares for the upcoming elections, this trend of misinformation and manipulation on social media poses a challenge to the democratic process. Groups like the Heritage Foundation, True the Vote, and a new project called the Election Integrity Network are organizing workshops and educational sessions about the spread of misinformation online. Their campaign includes advice on the most effective times and formats for posts, as well as how to engage with the audience through graphic displays. This strategy further encourages users to spread doubts about the electoral process, and the narrative about potential irregularities becomes increasingly prevalent on social media.


Despite official denials and attempts to censor false information, social media platforms like Truth Social and other similar platforms continue to allow such content, making it significantly harder to build public trust in the electoral process. Critics argue that content moderation on these networks is inadequate, and numerous reports show how tech giants completely ignore these types of misinformation, despite serious consequences for democracy and the electoral process in the U.S.


Political and social polarization as a result


Trump's rhetoric on social media has further divided American society, where many supporters feel like victims of a grand conspiracy plan. The association with terms such as “false accusations” and “disruption in the electoral process” further emphasizes polarization. These feelings are further fueled by networks that support Trump’s rhetoric and further reinforce the perception of division, resulting in serious consequences for public discourse in the U.S. Critics believe that social media has enabled such narratives to spread quickly and create “information bubbles” where it is easier to find evidence for almost any theory, regardless of whether it has a basis in reality or not.

Find accommodation nearby

Creation time: 31 October, 2024

Political desk

The political desk shapes its content with the belief that responsible writing and a solid understanding of social processes hold essential value in the public sphere. For years, we have been analyzing political events, monitoring changes that affect citizens, and reflecting on the relationships between institutions, individuals, and the international community. Our approach is based on experience gained through long-term work in journalism and direct observation of political scenes in different countries and systems.

In our editorial work, we emphasize context, because we know that politics is never just the news of the day. Behind every move, statement, or decision are circumstances that define its true significance, and our task is to bring readers closer to the background and intentions that are not visible at first glance. In our articles, we strive to build a vivid picture of society – its tensions, ambitions, problems, and those moments when opportunities for change arise.

Over the years, we have learned that political reporting is not reduced to retelling conferences and press releases. It requires patience, observation, and a willingness to compare various sources, assess credibility, recognize patterns of behavior, and find meaning in actions that sometimes seem contradictory. To achieve this, we rely on experience gained through long-term work with public institutions, civil society organizations, analysts, and individuals who shape political reality through their activities.

Our writing stems from personal fieldwork: from conventions, protests, parliamentary sessions, international forums, and conversations with people who experience politics from within. These encounters shape texts in which we strive to be clear, precise, and fair, without dramatizing and without deviating from facts. We want the reader to feel informed, not overwhelmed, and to receive a picture that enables them to independently assess what a given decision means for their everyday life.

The political desk believes in the importance of open and responsible journalism. In a world full of quick reactions and sensationalism, we choose diligent, long-term work on texts that offer a broader perspective. It is a slower path, but the only one that ensures content that is thorough, credible, and in the service of the reader. Our approach has grown from decades of experience and the conviction that an informed citizen is the strongest guardian of democratic processes.

That is why our publications do not merely follow the daily news cycle. They seek to understand what political events truly mean, where they lead, and how they fit into the broader picture of international relations. We write with respect for the reader and with the awareness that politics is not an isolated field, but a space where economy, culture, identity, security, and the individual life of each person intersect.

NOTE FOR OUR READERS
Karlobag.eu provides news, analyses and information on global events and topics of interest to readers worldwide. All published information is for informational purposes only.
We emphasize that we are not experts in scientific, medical, financial or legal fields. Therefore, before making any decisions based on the information from our portal, we recommend that you consult with qualified experts.
Karlobag.eu may contain links to external third-party sites, including affiliate links and sponsored content. If you purchase a product or service through these links, we may earn a commission. We have no control over the content or policies of these sites and assume no responsibility for their accuracy, availability or any transactions conducted through them.
If we publish information about events or ticket sales, please note that we do not sell tickets either directly or via intermediaries. Our portal solely informs readers about events and purchasing opportunities through external sales platforms. We connect readers with partners offering ticket sales services, but do not guarantee their availability, prices or purchase conditions. All ticket information is obtained from third parties and may be subject to change without prior notice. We recommend that you thoroughly check the sales conditions with the selected partner before any purchase, as the Karlobag.eu portal does not assume responsibility for transactions or ticket sale conditions.
All information on our portal is subject to change without prior notice. By using this portal, you agree to read the content at your own risk.